By conducting a Google with a set of 88 participants through a combination of multiple-choice questions and short answers, I gained valuable insights into the behaviors of dog owners and their beloved pets. This data not only provided intelligence on various habits but also served to corroborated similar findings found in research already existing in the field regarding the environmental impact and health risks associated with dog toys.
To delve deeper into the field, I conducted interviews with three prospective users, exploring their personal experiences with dog ownership, including their shopping habits and playtime routines, as well as gathering insights into the behaviors and habits of their beloved furry companions.
When evaluating the current market across two spectrums—durability versus disposability, and healthiness versus toxicity—it's apparent that numerous products marketed as "long-lasting" often rely on nylon or synthetic materials. Conversely, options promoting healthiness and longevity tend to be limited, primarily comprising treats or materials with warnings of splintering, which can pose risks to the safety of dogs.
When examining the current market and comparing products based on their longevity, cost, and composition—whether natural or synthetic—it becomes evident that numerous low-cost options are often short-lived or poorly constructed, using materials that may pose risks to both pets and the environment. Interestingly, the price tag does not consistently correlate with the extent of synthetic materials utilized in the production of these toys.
